Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Higher quality of molecular testing, an unfulfilled priority: Results from external quality assessment for KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer.
Tembuyser, Lien; Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J L; Normanno, Nicola; Delen, Sofie; van Krieken, J Han; Dequeker, Elisabeth M C.
Afiliação
  • Tembuyser L; Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Ligtenberg MJ; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Normanno N; Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, National Institute for the Study and Treatment of Cancer "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
  • Delen S; Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • van Krieken JH; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Dequeker EM; Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: els.dequeker@med.kuleuven.be.
J Mol Diagn ; 16(3): 371-7, 2014 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24631467
ABSTRACT
Precision medicine is now a key element in clinical oncology. RAS mutational status is a crucial predictor of responsiveness to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. In an effort to guarantee high-quality testing services in molecular pathology, the European Society of Pathology has been organizing an annual KRAS external quality assessment program since 2009. In 2012, 10 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, of which 8 from invasive metastatic colorectal cancer tissue and 2 artificial samples of cell line material, were sent to more than 100 laboratories from 26 countries with a request for routine KRAS testing. Both genotyping and clinical reports were assessed independently. Twenty-seven percent of the participants genotyped at least 1 of 10 samples incorrectly. In total, less than 5% of the distributed specimens were genotyped incorrectly. Genotyping errors consisted of false negatives, false positives, and incorrectly genotyped mutations. Twenty percent of the laboratories reported a technical error for one or more samples. A review of the written reports showed that several essential elements were missing, most notably a clinical interpretation of the test result, the method sensitivity, and the use of a reference sequence. External quality assessment serves as a valuable educational tool in assessing and improving molecular testing quality and is an important asset for monitoring quality assurance upon incorporation of new biomarkers in diagnostic services.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Mutacional de DNA / Neoplasias Colorretais / Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas / Proteínas ras / Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial / Técnicas de Genotipagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Mutacional de DNA / Neoplasias Colorretais / Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas / Proteínas ras / Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial / Técnicas de Genotipagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article