Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An instrumental variable approach finds no associated harm or benefit with early dialysis initiation in the United States.
Scialla, Julia J; Liu, Jiannong; Crews, Deidra C; Guo, Haifeng; Bandeen-Roche, Karen; Ephraim, Patti L; Tangri, Navdeep; Sozio, Stephen M; Shafi, Tariq; Miskulin, Dana C; Michels, Wieneke M; Jaar, Bernard G; Wu, Albert W; Powe, Neil R; Boulware, L Ebony.
Afiliação
  • Scialla JJ; Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Liu J; Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Crews DC; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Guo H; Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Bandeen-Roche K; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Ephraim PL; 1] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Tangri N; Department of Medicine, Seven Oaks General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Sozio SM; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Shafi T; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Miskulin DC; Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Michels WM; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [3] Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Nethe
  • Jaar BG; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [3] Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
  • Wu AW; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [3] Department of Health, Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
  • Powe NR; San Francisco General Hospital and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Boulware LE; 1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [2] Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [3] Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Kidney Int ; 86(4): 798-809, 2014 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24786707
ABSTRACT
The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation has been rising. Observational studies suggest harm, but may be confounded by unmeasured factors. As instrumental variable methods may be less biased, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 310,932 patients who started dialysis between 2006 and 2008 and were registered in the United States Renal Data System in order to describe geographic variation in eGFR at dialysis initiation and determine its association with mortality. Patients were grouped into 804 health service areas (HSAs) by zip code. Individual eGFR at dialysis initiation averaged 10.8 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) but varied geographically. Only 11% of the variation in mean HSA-level eGFR at dialysis initiation was accounted for by patient characteristics. We calculated demographic-adjusted mean eGFR at dialysis initiation in the HSAs using the 2006 and 2007 incident cohort as our instrument and estimated the association between individual eGFR at dialysis initiation and mortality in the 2008 incident cohort using the two-stage residual inclusion method. Among 89,547 patients starting dialysis in 2008 with eGFR 5-20 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), eGFR at initiation was not associated with mortality over a median of 15.5 months (hazard ratio, 1.025 per 1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) for eGFR 5-14 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); and 0.973 per 1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) for eGFR 14-20 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). Thus, there was no associated harm or benefit with early dialysis initiation in the United States.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Área Programática de Saúde / Diálise Renal / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Intervenção Médica Precoce Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Área Programática de Saúde / Diálise Renal / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Intervenção Médica Precoce Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article