Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing functional mobility after lower limb reconstruction: a psychometric evaluation of a sensor-based mobility score.
Kwasnicki, Richard M; Hettiaratchy, Shehan; Jarchi, Delaram; Nightingale, Craig; Wordsworth, Matthew; Simmons, Jon; Yang, Guang-Zhong; Darzi, Ara.
Afiliação
  • Kwasnicki RM; *Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and †Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Surg ; 261(4): 800-6, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25347150
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To develop and validate a robust, objective mobility assessment tool, Hamlyn Mobility Score (HMS), using a wearable motion sensor.

BACKGROUND:

Advances in reconstructive techniques allow more limbs to be salvaged. However, evidence demonstrating superior long-term outcomes compared with amputation is unavailable. Lack of access to quality regular functional mobility status may be preventing patients and health care staff from optimizing rehabilitation programs and evaluating the reconstructive services.

METHODS:

In this prospective cohort study, 20 patients undergoing lower limb reconstruction and 10 age-matched controls were recruited. All subjects completed the HMS activity protocol twice under different instructors at 3 months postoperatively, and again at 6 months, while wearing an ear-worn accelerometer. Demographic and clinical data were also collected including a short-form health survey (SF-36). HMS parameters included standard test metrics and additional kinematic features extracted from accelerometer data. A psychometric evaluation was conducted to ascertain reliability and validity.

RESULTS:

The HMS demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90, P < 0.001) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.897). Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlation between HMS and SF-36 scores (Spearman ρ = 0.666, P = 0.005). Significant HMS differences between healthy subjects and patients, stratified according to fracture severity, were shown (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric 1-way analysis of variance, χ = 21.5, P < 0.001). The HMS was 50% more responsive to change than SF-36 (effect size 1.49 vs 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS:

The HMS shows satisfactory reliability and validity and may provide a platform to support adaptable, personalized rehabilitation and enhanced service evaluation to facilitate optimal patient outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Fraturas da Tíbia / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Limitação da Mobilidade / Fraturas Expostas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Fraturas da Tíbia / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Limitação da Mobilidade / Fraturas Expostas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article