Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of insulin treatment in diabetic macular edema therapy in type 2 diabetes.
Matsuda, Simone; Tam, Tiffany; Singh, Rishi P; Kaiser, Peter K; Petkovsek, Daniel; Zanella, Maria Teresa; Ehlers, Justis P.
Afiliação
  • Matsuda S; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Tam T; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Singh RP; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Kaiser PK; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Petkovsek D; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Zanella MT; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Ehlers JP; Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America. Electronic address: ehlersj@ccf.org.
Can J Diabetes ; 39(1): 73-7, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444681
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the impact of insulin therapy on the outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

A retrospective consecutive case series of 95 patients with type 2 diabetes and DME who were treated with anti-VEGF therapy. We examined 2 cohorts patients taking only oral antidiabetic agents and patients on insulin therapy. The main outcome measures were change in visual acuity and change in central subfield macular thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The additional variables analyzed included glycated hemoglobin (A1C), creatinine, blood pressure and body mass index and their correlations with clinical findings.

RESULTS:

Both groups had a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (oral antidiabetic agents group 20/61 to 20/49, p=0.003; insulin therapy group 20/76 to 20/56, p=0.005). There was no difference between groups at initial or 12-month examination (p=0.239 and p=0.489, respectively). From an anatomic standpoint, central subfield macular thickness also improved significantly in both groups from 454.7 µm to 354.9 µm (p<0.001) in the oral antidiabetic agents group and from 471.5 µm to 368.4 µm (p<0.001) in the insulin therapy group. Again, there was no significant difference between groups at initial or 12-month follow-up examinations (p=0.586 and p=0.591, respectively). Mean A1C levels remained relatively stable during the follow up in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

Anti-VEGF therapy is a useful treatment for DME. This study suggests that chronic insulin therapy, compared with oral antidiabetic agents, does not modify the anatomic or functional effectiveness of DME treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insulina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Insulina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article