Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.
Ann Stomatol (Roma)
; 5(Suppl 2 to No 2): 27-36, 2014.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25678948
ABSTRACT
AIM OF THE STUDY Reconstruction of segmental defects and the atrophic maxilla and mandible is performed using various techniques. Bone substitutes have received a wealth of reports in the literature demonstrating a long-term success when used in alveolar bone augmentation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We reviewed articles comparing TiMesh GBR technique with different percentage of bone autogenous bone alone (AB); anorganic bovine bone alone (ABB); 5050 or 7030. From an initial pool of 122, we selected 14 studies. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS:
We present a table analysing fundamental parameters to value a successful GBR therapy. Autogenous bone remains the gold standard in GBR technique with TiMesh; however, the combination between AB/ABB in relation 5050 and 7030 allows reducing surgical cost exploiting properties of eterologous bone.CONCLUSION:
The use of autologous bone is associated with a height and width gain of bone, which are greater compared to other techniques, with a lower exposure of the mesh and a lower bone resorption. The use of heterologous graft leads to a lower bone earn and to percentage of resorption greater than autologous graft but does not differ from the gain and resorption of the bone of AB/ABB in percentage 5050 and 7030.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Article