The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pathological examination of hernia sac specimens adds additional steps and cost to a surgical procedure but has no proven benefit. Although well studied in pediatrics, there are limited data in the adult literature pertaining to this practice. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis from a single institution referral center over a 4-year period (2007 to 2011). All inguinal, incisional, ventral, and umbilical hernia repairs greater than 18 years of age were included. RESULTS: A total of 1,216 inguinal (55.4%), incisional (11.4%), umbilical (21.5%), or ventral hernia (11.7%) repairs were included. In 246 cases (20.2%), hernia sac specimens were sent to pathology (open 96.7%; laparoscopic 3.3%). There were no cases in which management of the patient changed because of the final results. CONCLUSION: The rarity of changes in diagnosis and treatment from routine pathologic examination of a hernia sac does not justify this practice and indicates that it may be omitted except in unique circumstances.