Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wireless Ultrasound Guidance for Femoral Venous Cannulation in Electrophysiology: Impact on Safety, Efficacy, and Procedural Delay.
Rodríguez Muñoz, Daniel; Franco Díez, Eduardo; Moreno, Javier; Lumia, Giuseppe; Carbonell San Román, Alejandra; Segura De La Cal, Teresa; Matía Francés, Roberto; Hernández Madrid, Antonio; Zamorano Gómez, José Luis.
Afiliação
  • Rodríguez Muñoz D; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Franco Díez E; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Moreno J; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lumia G; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Carbonell San Román A; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Segura De La Cal T; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Matía Francés R; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Hernández Madrid A; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Zamorano Gómez JL; From the Department of Cardiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 38(9): 1058-65, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010612
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ultrasound (US) guidance increases safety and efficacy in vascular cannulation and is considered the standard of care. However, barriers including workflow interference and the need to be assisted by a second operator limit its adoption in clinical routine. The use of wireless US (WUS) may overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a novel WUS probe during its initial implantation in an electrophysiology (EP) laboratory.

METHODS:

Thirty-six patients requiring femoral venous cannulation for EP procedures were included in this single center, prospective, observational study, comparing WUS guidance with the anatomical landmark approach. The primary endpoint was time to successful cannulation. Secondary endpoints included rate of unsuccessful punctures, accidental arterial punctures, and workflow interference.

RESULTS:

Compared with anatomical landmark approach, WUS guidance significantly reduced mean time to successful cannulation (87.3 ± 94.3 vs 238.1 ± 294.7 seconds, P < 0.01). Workflow interference was predominantly nonexistent or mild and decreased after the first three weeks of use. In addition, WUS guidance improved safety and efficacy, reducing the rate of accidental arterial punctures (0.02 ± 0.1 vs 0.25 ± 0.5 arterial punctures per cannulation, P < 0.05) and unsuccessful attempts (0.26 ± 0.8 vs 1.75 ± 2.1 attempts per cannulation, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

WUS guidance resulted in faster, safer, and more effective femoral venous cannulation than the anatomical landmark approach without adding significant workflow interference. The application of wireless technology in this setting contributed to overcoming some of the barriers preventing a more widespread clinical use of US guidance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Veia Femoral / Fluxo de Trabalho / Tecnologia sem Fio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Veia Femoral / Fluxo de Trabalho / Tecnologia sem Fio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article