Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nares-to-carina distance in children: does a 'modified Morgan formula' give useful guidance during nasal intubation?
Hunyady, Agnes I; Otto, Randolph K; Christensen, Alexis; Jonmarker, Christer.
Afiliação
  • Hunyady AI; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Otto RK; Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Christensen A; Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Jonmarker C; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 25(9): 936-42, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033678
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Knowledge of the normal nares-to-carina (NC) distance might prevent accidental bronchial intubation and be helpful when designing preformed endotracheal tubes (ETT).

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to measure NC distance and to examine whether a height/length-based 'modified Morgan formula' would give useful guidance for nasotracheal ETT depth positioning.

METHODS:

Two groups were studied. A younger group consisted of nasally intubated postoperative patients. In these, NC distance was obtained as the sum of ETT length and the distance from the ETT tip to the carina, as measured from an anteroposterior chest X-ray. An older group consisted of children who had undergone computerized tomography (CT) examination including head, neck, and chest. In these, NC was measured directly from the CT image. The modified Morgan formula was derived from the NC vs height/length relationship.

RESULTS:

Nares-to-carina distance was best predicted by a linear equation based on patient height. The equation in the younger group (1 day-8 years, n = 57) was NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 5.8, R(2) = 0.90, and in the older group (2.1-20 years, n = 45) NC (cm) = 0.15 × height + 3.4, R(2) = 0.93. The equation for the groups combined (n = 102) was NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 6.2, R(2) = 0.97. Based on the latter equation, a modified Morgan formula was identified as ETT position at nares in cm = 0.12 × height + 5. If the ETT had been placed as calculated by this formula, the ETT tip would have been at 85 + 5% (mean ± sd) of NC distance, and the ETT tip-to-carina distance would have been 3.1 ± 1.1 cm (range 0-6.6). Bronchial intubation would not have occurred in any child, but a comparison to tracheal length measurements indicates that ETT tip position could be too proximal in some children.

CONCLUSION:

The study confirms previous reports NC distance can be well predicted from height/length. A modified Morgan formula might decrease the risk for accidental endobronchial intubation in infants and children, but ETT position need to be confirmed by auscultation or other verification.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estatura / Pesos e Medidas Corporais / Intubação Intratraqueal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estatura / Pesos e Medidas Corporais / Intubação Intratraqueal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article