Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The utility of Google Trends data to examine interest in cancer screening.
Schootman, M; Toor, A; Cavazos-Rehg, P; Jeffe, D B; McQueen, A; Eberth, J; Davidson, N O.
Afiliação
  • Schootman M; Department of Epidemiology, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Toor A; Department of Epidemiology, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Cavazos-Rehg P; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Jeffe DB; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • McQueen A; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Eberth J; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Davidson NO; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
BMJ Open ; 5(6): e006678, 2015 Jun 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26056120
OBJECTIVES: We examined the utility of January 2004 to April 2014 Google Trends data from information searches for cancer screenings and preparations as a complement to population screening data, which are traditionally estimated through costly population-level surveys. SETTING: State-level data across the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Persons who searched for terms related to cancer screening using Google, and persons who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) State-level Google Trends data, providing relative search volume (RSV) data scaled to the highest search proportion per week (RSV100) for search terms over time since 2004 and across different geographical locations. (2) RSV of new screening tests, free/low-cost screening for breast and colorectal cancer, and new preparations for colonoscopy (Prepopik). (3) State-level breast, cervical, colorectal and prostate cancer screening rates. RESULTS: Correlations between Google Trends and BRFSS data ranged from 0.55 for ever having had a colonoscopy to 0.14 for having a Pap smear within the past 3 years. Free/low-cost mammography and colonoscopy showed higher RSV during their respective cancer awareness months. RSV for Miralax remained stable, while interest in Prepopik increased over time. RSV for lung cancer screening, virtual colonoscopy and three-dimensional mammography was low. CONCLUSIONS: Google Trends data provides enormous scientific possibilities, but are not a suitable substitute for, but may complement, traditional data collection and analysis about cancer screening and related interests.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Coleta de Dados / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Comportamento de Busca de Informação / Ferramenta de Busca / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Programas de Rastreamento / Coleta de Dados / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Comportamento de Busca de Informação / Ferramenta de Busca / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article