[Evaluation of a new residency program at the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf]. / Evaluation eines neuen Weiterbildungsprogramms in der Augenklinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

BACKGROUND: The German ophthalmological training is still a very individually organized system with only one final oral examination at the end of the 5-year residency. At the beginning of 2013 a new residency program was introduced at the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf. This study evaluated the resident satisfaction with the new concept. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new residency program consists of three main changes: firstly a structured training with fixed rotation in the various subdisciplines of ophthalmology, secondly a list of practical skills examinations that has to be completed during the 5-year program and thirdly annual intermediate oral examinations. The satisfaction of the residents with the new program was anonymously evaluated with a Likert scale-based questionnaire with 15 items and additional free text comments. RESULTS: (1) The structured training was mostly rated positively and 9 out of 12 of residents favored a continuation of the training concept in this form. (2) Only 7 out of 11 residents (64 %) wanted to continue the practical skills examinations in this form and only approximately half of the residents saw a positive effect of these examinations. (3) Regarding the annual examinations 8 out of 11 residents (73 %) reported that the examinations helped them to assess their skills better, 91 % (10 out of 11) reported a learning motivation, 90 % (9 out of 10) an improvement in learning due to the examinations and 73 % (8 out of 11) were of the opinion that the examinations should take place regularly. DISCUSSION: The structured training and the annual examinations were positively evaluated. These changes could be effectively implemented even with a relatively small personnel structure. In comparison the practical skill examinations were rated relatively negatively, probably because of the further increase of daily work. The number of skills to be demonstrated is currently reduced and the integration of testing into the clinical routine of examiners and examinees is under revision.