Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Midterm follow-up outcomes of ticagrelor on acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention].
Xia, Jing-gang; Qu, Yang; Hu, Shao-dong; Xu, Ji; Yin, Chun-lin; Xu, Dong.
Afiliação
  • Xia JG; Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
  • Qu Y; Deparment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital,Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
  • Hu SD; Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
  • Xu J; Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
  • Yin CL; Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
  • Xu D; Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 47(3): 494-8, 2015 Jun 18.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26080882
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: In the study, 96 patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction onset within 12 h undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from May to October in 2013 were randomly divided into ticagrelor group (n=48) and clopidogrel group (n=48) by using the method of random number table. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel antiplatelet treatment were used before and after operation. Their baseline data, coronary artery disease characteristics, platelet count, adenosine diphosphate(ADP)-induced platelet inhibition rate by thrombelastograph after 5 days of treatment, the major adverse cardiovascular events of the follow up for 6 months and bleeding complications were observed and compared in the two groups. RESULTS: The differences between the two groups of patients with their baseline data, the features of coronary artery lesions, platelet count before and after 5 days of treatment had no statistical significance (P>0.05). ADP induced platelet inhibition rate [(80.2±10.7)%] after 5 days of treatment in ticagrelor group was significantly higher than that in clopidogrel group [(75.3±12.1)%, P<0.05]. The two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months, 8 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in clopidogrel group, 2 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in ticagrelor group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The two groups (7 cases of 48 patients in ticagrelor group vs. 3 cases of 48 patients in clopidogrel group) had no statistically significant difference in bleeding complications (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI has good efficacy and safety.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Adenosina / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea / Infarto do Miocárdio Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Adenosina / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea / Infarto do Miocárdio Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article