Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using microbubble sonographic contrast agent to enhance the effect of high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of uterine fibroids.
Isern, J; Pessarrodona, A; Rodriguez, J; Vallejo, E; Gimenez, N; Cassadó, J; De Marco, J A; Pedrerol, A.
Afiliação
  • Isern J; HIFU Unit, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • Pessarrodona A; HIFU Unit, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain. Electronic address: apessarrodona@mutuaterrassa.es.
  • Rodriguez J; HIFU Unit, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • Vallejo E; HIFU Unit, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • Gimenez N; Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • Cassadó J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • De Marco JA; Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
  • Pedrerol A; Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Spain.
Ultrason Sonochem ; 27: 688-693, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26113390
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue in enhancing the ablative effects of Ultrasound-Guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) on different sub-types of uterine fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 390 fibroids from 319 patients were retrospectively evaluated, among which 155 were treated with SonoVue and 235 were without SonoVue during HIFU ablation. The efficacy of HIFU was evaluated using magnetic resonance scanning (MRI) in all patients. RESULTS: The total ablation time to achieve the same non-perfused volume was significantly shortened with SonoVue. The average energy used and the acoustic energy for treating 1 mm(3) (EEF) was less when SonoVue is used as enhancing agent. The non-perfused volume (NPV) was measured by post-HIFU MRI and the mean fractional ablation was calculated. Mean NPV was 74% (range: 15%-100%) in the HIFU-only group and 75% (range: 17%-100%) in the HIFU+ SonoVue group. However, for T2 MRI low intensity signal fibroids, NPV in the SonoVue group reached 83% (range: 20%-100%) that was significantly higher than in the HIFU-only group, which was 76% (range: 15%-100%). No differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations demonstrate that the use of therapeutic SonoVue during the HIFU procedure can significantly decrease the ablation time and the energy requirement for the treatment of the same fibroid volume in all types of fibroids.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meios de Contraste / Microbolhas / Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade / Leiomioma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meios de Contraste / Microbolhas / Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade / Leiomioma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article