Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Midterm Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer Treatment for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication.
Marcia, Stefano; Hirsch, Joshua A; Chandra, Ronil V; Marras, Mariangela; Piras, Emanuele; Anselmetti, Giovanni Carlo; Muto, Mario; Saba, Luca.
Afiliação
  • Marcia S; Department of Radiology, SS. Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Hirsch JA; Neuroendovascular Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Chandra RV; Neurovascular Surgery and Neuroradiology Services, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Marras M; Interventional Radiology, Villa Maria Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Piras E; Department of Radiology, SS. Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Anselmetti GC; Interventional Radiology, Villa Maria Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Muto M; Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedale Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
  • Saba L; Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, Cagliari 09045, Italy. Electronic address: lucasaba@tiscali.it.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 26(11): 1687-93.e1-2, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26119203
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiologic outcome of percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in patients who fail conservative treatment.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients with NIC, lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging, failure of conservative management for at least 6 months, and treatment with percutaneous IPS were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded at baseline, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years after treatment. Spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional areas were calculated from multidetector computed tomography at baseline and 1 year.

RESULTS:

There were 80 patients treated with 94 IPS devices; 83% of patients received a single IPS; 78% of IPS devices were placed at L4-L5. An IPS dislocation was the single periprocedural major complication. VAS score of 8.1 ± 2 before treatment was reduced to 4.4 ± 2 at 1 month after treatment (P = .0001); ODI score of 23.3 ± 10 before treatment was reduced to 11.7 ± 8.5 at 1 month after treatment (P = .0001). These significant reductions were durable at 1-year and 3-year follow-up evaluations (P < .01). Spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional area increased by 15% at 1 year (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with NIC who failed conservative treatment and were treated with percutaneous IPS achieved significant gains in pain relief and reduced disability that remained durable at 3-year clinical follow-up evaluation. This outcome was accompanied by significant increases in spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional areas at the treated level.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Radiografia Intervencionista / Descompressão Cirúrgica / Substituição Total de Disco / Claudicação Intermitente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Radiografia Intervencionista / Descompressão Cirúrgica / Substituição Total de Disco / Claudicação Intermitente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article