Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of portal pedicle clamping on survival from colorectal liver metastases in the contemporary era of liver resection: a matched cohort study.
Tsang, Melanie E; Karanicolas, Paul J; Habashi, Rogeh; Cheng, Eva; Hanna, Sherif S; Coburn, Natalie G; Law, Calvin H L; Hallet, Julie.
Afiliação
  • Tsang ME; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Karanicolas PJ; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Habashi R; Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre - Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Cheng E; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Hanna SS; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Coburn NG; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Law CH; Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre - Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Hallet J; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
HPB (Oxford) ; 17(9): 796-803, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26278322
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Portal pedicle clamping (PPC) may impact micro-metastases' growth. This study examined the association between PPC and survival after a hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS:

A matched cohort study was conducted on hepatectomies for CRLM at a single institution (2003-2012). Cohorts were selected based on PPC use, with 11 matching for age, time period and the Clinical Risk Score. Outcomes were overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS). Cox regression was performed to assess the association between PPC and survival.

RESULTS:

Of 481 hepatectomies, 26.9% used PPC. One hundred and ten pairs of patients were matched in the cohorts. There was no significant difference in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.83], with a 5-year OS of 57.8% (95%CI 52.4-63.2%) with PPC versus 62.3% (95%CI 57.1-67.5%) without. Five-year RFS did not differ (HR 0.98; 95%CI 0.71-1.35) with 29.7% (95%CI 24.9-34.5%) with PPC versus 28.0% (95%CI 23.2-32.8%) without. When adjusting for extent of resection, transfusion, operative time and surgeon, there was no difference in OS (HR 0.91; 95%CI 0.52-1.60) or RFS (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.57-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS:

PPC was not associated with a significant difference in OS or RFS in a hepatectomy for CRLM. PPC remains a safe technique during hepatectomy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article