Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The vest-collar as a rodent collar to prevent licking and scratching during experiments.
Jang, Yura; Park, Ye Eun; Yun, Cheol-Won; Kim, Dae-Hyun; Chung, Hesson.
Afiliação
  • Jang Y; Center for Neuro-Medicine, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park YE; Center for Neuro-Medicine, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yun CW; School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim DH; College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea vet1982@hanmail.net heschung@kist.re.kr.
  • Chung H; Center for Neuro-Medicine, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
Lab Anim ; 50(4): 296-304, 2016 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449248
Various types of restraint collars have been used for research animals, and the Elizabethan collar (E-collar) is the most commonly used. However, animals can be choked by the E-collar or they tend to remove it; furthermore, repeated rubbing and scratching of the collar may chafe the neck. We developed a new restraint collar with a vest to overcome these limitations. The vest-collar (V-collar) can be worn similarly to a vest, in contrast to the E-collar, which is fixed around the neck. A cone-shaped collar is attached to the vest in the V-collar and is made of Eva foam to surround the chest softly, accompanied by a transparent polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film for visibility. To evaluate the performance of the V-collar, we conducted experiments with mice wearing the V-collar and the E-collar. Both groups showed normal weight gain and food intake. Glucose and stress hormone levels showed no significant differences, and no stress-associated leukocyte profiles were observed during the experiments. However, despite the short experimental duration, more than half of the mice in the E-collar group showed injury to the skin on the neck, with increased thickness of the epidermal and keratin layers. Moreover, inflammatory cell counts were higher in the E-collar group than in the V-collar group. In conclusion, the V-collar, in contrast to the E-collar, does not cause skin injuries in animals and is thus beneficial for animals and investigators. Investigators can effectively use the V-collar to enhance laboratory animal welfare.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipamentos de Proteção / Bem-Estar do Animal / Restrição Física / Criação de Animais Domésticos / Animais de Laboratório Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipamentos de Proteção / Bem-Estar do Animal / Restrição Física / Criação de Animais Domésticos / Animais de Laboratório Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article