Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study.
Prünte, Christian; Fajnkuchen, Franck; Mahmood, Sajjad; Ricci, Federico; Hatz, Katja; Studnicka, Jan; Bezlyak, Vladimir; Parikh, Soumil; Stubbings, William John; Wenzel, Andreas; Figueira, João.
Afiliação
  • Prünte C; Department of Ophthalmology, Vista Klinik, Binningen, Switzerland Kantonsspital Baselland, Eye Clinic, Liestal, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Fajnkuchen F; Centre d'Imagerie et Laser, Paris, France.
  • Mahmood S; Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Ricci F; PTV Foundation, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
  • Hatz K; Department of Ophthalmology, Vista Klinik, Binningen, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Studnicka J; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
  • Bezlyak V; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Parikh S; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Stubbings WJ; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Wenzel A; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Figueira J; AIBILI, Coimbra, Portugal Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 100(6): 787-95, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26453639
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To demonstrate non-inferiority of ranibizumab treat-and-extend (T&E) with/without laser to ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS:

A 24-month single-masked study with patients randomised 111 to T&E+laser (n=121), T&E (n=128) or PRN (control; n=123). All patients received monthly injections until BCVA stabilisation. The investigator decided on re-treatment in the PRN and treatment-interval adaptations in the T&E groups based on loss of BCVA stability due to DMO activity. Likewise, laser treatment was at investigator's discretion. Collectively, these features reflect a real-life scenario. Endpoints included mean average change in BCVA from baseline to months 1-12 (primary), mean BCVA change from baseline to months 12 and 24, treatment exposure and safety profile.

RESULTS:

Both T&E regimens were non-inferior to PRN based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to months 1-12 (T&E+laser +5.9 and T&E +6.1 vs PRN +6.2 letters; both p<0.0001). Mean BCVA change at month 24 was similar across groups (+8.3, +6.5 and +8.1 letters, respectively). The mean number of injections was 12.4 and 12.8 in the T&E+laser and T&E groups and 10.7 in the PRN group. The T&E regimens showed 46% reduction in the number of clinic visits. Over 70% of patients maintained their BCVA, with treatment intervals of ≥2 months over 24 months. Safety profile was consistent with that described in the product information.

CONCLUSIONS:

T&E is a feasible treatment option for patients with DMO, with a potential to reduce treatment burden. Slightly more injections were required versus PRN, likely due to the specifics of the T&E regimen applied here. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01171976.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Edema Macular / Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular / Retinopatia Diabética / Ranibizumab / Macula Lutea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Edema Macular / Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular / Retinopatia Diabética / Ranibizumab / Macula Lutea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article