Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder.
Morey, R A; Dunsmoor, J E; Haswell, C C; Brown, V M; Vora, A; Weiner, J; Stjepanovic, D; Wagner, H R; LaBar, K S.
Afiliação
  • Morey RA; Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Dunsmoor JE; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Haswell CC; Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Brown VM; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Vora A; Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Weiner J; Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Stjepanovic D; Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Wagner HR; Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • LaBar KS; School of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Transl Psychiatry ; 5: e700, 2015 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670285
Fear conditioning is an established model for investigating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, symptom triggers may vaguely resemble the initial traumatic event, differing on a variety of sensory and affective dimensions. We extended the fear-conditioning model to assess generalization of conditioned fear on fear processing neurocircuitry in PTSD. Military veterans (n=67) consisting of PTSD (n=32) and trauma-exposed comparison (n=35) groups underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during fear conditioning to a low fear-expressing face while a neutral face was explicitly unreinforced. Stimuli that varied along a neutral-to-fearful continuum were presented before conditioning to assess baseline responses, and after conditioning to assess experience-dependent changes in neural activity. Compared with trauma-exposed controls, PTSD patients exhibited greater post-study memory distortion of the fear-conditioned stimulus toward the stimulus expressing the highest fear intensity. PTSD patients exhibited biased neural activation toward high-intensity stimuli in fusiform gyrus (P<0.02), insula (P<0.001), primary visual cortex (P<0.05), locus coeruleus (P<0.04), thalamus (P<0.01), and at the trend level in inferior frontal gyrus (P=0.07). All regions except fusiform were moderated by childhood trauma. Amygdala-calcarine (P=0.01) and amygdala-thalamus (P=0.06) functional connectivity selectively increased in PTSD patients for high-intensity stimuli after conditioning. In contrast, amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex (P=0.04) connectivity selectively increased in trauma-exposed controls compared with PTSD patients for low-intensity stimuli after conditioning, representing safety learning. In summary, fear generalization in PTSD is biased toward stimuli with higher emotional intensity than the original conditioned-fear stimulus. Functional brain differences provide a putative neurobiological model for fear generalization whereby PTSD symptoms are triggered by threat cues that merely resemble the index trauma.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos / Medo / Generalização Psicológica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos / Medo / Generalização Psicológica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article