Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.
Krause, Ulrich; Backhoff, David; Klehs, Sophia; Schneider, Heike E; Paul, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Krause U; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. ukrause1@gwdg.de.
  • Backhoff D; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Klehs S; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Schneider HE; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Paul T; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 46(2): 191-8, 2016 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26743070
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Monitoring of catheter contact force during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has been shown to increase efficacy and safety. However, almost no data exists on the use of this technology in catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in those patients.

METHODS:

Catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia using monitoring of catheter contact force was performed in 28 patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Thirty-two patients matched according to gender, age, and body weight with congenital heart disease undergoing catheter ablation without contact force monitoring served as control group. Parameters reflecting acute procedural success, long-term efficacy, and safety were compared.

RESULTS:

Acute procedural success was statistically not different in both groups (contact force 93 % vs. control 84 %, p = 0.3). Likewise the recurrence rate 1 year after ablation as shown by Kaplan-Meier analysis did not differ (contact force 28 % vs. control 37 %, p = 0.63). Major complications were restricted to groin vessel injuries and occurred in 3 out of 60 patients (contact force n = 1; control n = 2). Complications related to excessive catheter contact force were not observed.

CONCLUSION:

The present study did not show superiority of catheter contact force monitoring during ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with CHD in terms of efficacy and safety. Higher contact force compared to pulmonary vein isolation might therefore be required to increase the efficacy of catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Monitorização Intraoperatória / Ablação por Cateter / Cardiopatias Congênitas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Monitorização Intraoperatória / Ablação por Cateter / Cardiopatias Congênitas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article