Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of rolapitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
Rapoport, Bernardo; Schwartzberg, Lee; Chasen, Martin; Powers, Dan; Arora, Sujata; Navari, Rudolph; Schnadig, Ian.
Afiliação
  • Rapoport B; The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: brapoport@rapoport.co.za.
  • Schwartzberg L; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Chasen M; William Osler Health Services, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Powers D; TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Arora S; TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Navari R; Indiana University School of Medicine - South Bend, South Bend, IN, USA.
  • Schnadig I; Compass Oncology, US Oncology Research, Tualatin, OR, USA.
Eur J Cancer ; 57: 23-30, 2016 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26851398
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Rolapitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), was shown to protect against delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) during the first cycle of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in randomized, double-blind trials. This analysis explored the efficacy and safety of rolapitant in preventing CINV over multiple cycles of MEC or HEC. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients in one phase III MEC, one phase II HEC, and two phase III HEC clinical trials were randomized to receive oral rolapitant (180 mg) or placebo in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 RA and dexamethasone. Regardless of response in cycle 1, patients could continue the same antiemetic treatment for up to six cycles. On days 6-8 of each subsequent chemotherapy cycle, patients reported the incidence of emesis and/or nausea interfering with normal daily life. Post hoc analyses of pooled safety and efficacy data from the four trials were performed for cycles 2-6.

RESULTS:

Significantly more patients receiving rolapitant than control reported no emesis or interfering nausea (combined measure) in cycles 2 (p = 0.006), 3 (p < 0.001), 4 (p = 0.001), and 5 (p = 0.021). Over cycles 1-6, time-to-first emesis was significantly longer with rolapitant than with control (p < 0.001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events during cycles 2-6 was similar in rolapitant (5.5%) and control (6.8%) arms. No cumulative toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Over multiple cycles of MEC or HEC, rolapitant provided superior CINV protection and reduced emesis and nausea interfering with daily life compared with control and remained well tolerated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Espiro / Vômito / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antieméticos / Náusea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Espiro / Vômito / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antieméticos / Náusea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article