Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-Time Automated Sampling of Electronic Medical Records Predicts Hospital Mortality.
Khurana, Hargobind S; Groves, Robert H; Simons, Michael P; Martin, Mary; Stoffer, Brenda; Kou, Sherri; Gerkin, Richard; Reiman, Eric; Parthasarathy, Sairam.
Afiliação
  • Khurana HS; Banner TeleHealth, Mesa, Ariz; Care Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz; Health Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz. Electronic address: Hargobind.Khurana@bannerhealth.com.
  • Groves RH; Banner TeleHealth, Mesa, Ariz; Care Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz; Health Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Simons MP; Banner Medical Group, Phoenix, Ariz; Banner Estrella Medical Center, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Martin M; Banner Corporate Center, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Stoffer B; Information Technology Clinical Systems, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Kou S; Clinical Performance Analytics, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Gerkin R; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix.
  • Reiman E; Banner Research, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz; Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Ariz.
  • Parthasarathy S; University of Arizona and Banner University Medical Center, Tucson.
Am J Med ; 129(7): 688-698.e2, 2016 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27019043
BACKGROUND: Real-time automated continuous sampling of electronic medical record data may expeditiously identify patients at risk for death and enable prompt life-saving interventions. We hypothesized that a real-time electronic medical record-based alert could identify hospitalized patients at risk for mortality. METHODS: An automated alert was developed and implemented to continuously sample electronic medical record data and trigger when at least 2 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria plus at least one of 14 acute organ dysfunction parameters was detected. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction alert was applied in real time to 312,214 patients in 24 hospitals and analyzed in 2 phases: training and validation datasets. RESULTS: In the training phase, 29,317 (18.8%) triggered the alert and 5.2% of such patients died, whereas only 0.2% without the alert died (unadjusted odds ratio 30.1; 95% confidence interval, 26.1-34.5; P < .0001). In the validation phase, the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for predicting mortality were 0.86, 0.82, 0.84, 4.9, and 0.16, respectively. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression model revealed greater hospital mortality when the alert was triggered (adjusted hazards ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-4.9; P < .0001). Triggering the alert was associated with additional hospitalization days (+3.0 days) and ventilator days (+1.6 days; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: An automated alert system that continuously samples electronic medical record data can be implemented, has excellent test characteristics, and can assist in the real-time identification of hospitalized patients at risk for death.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mortalidade Hospitalar / Estado Terminal / Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica / Sepse / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde / Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mortalidade Hospitalar / Estado Terminal / Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica / Sepse / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde / Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article