Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Monte Carlo Calculations Supporting Patient Plan Verification in Proton Therapy.
Lima, Thiago V M; Dosanjh, Manjit; Ferrari, Alfredo; Molineli, Silvia; Ciocca, Mario; Mairani, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Lima TV; European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Fachstelle Strahlenschutz, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Dosanjh M; European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) , Geneva , Switzerland.
  • Ferrari A; European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) , Geneva , Switzerland.
  • Molineli S; Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione CNAO , Pavia , Italy.
  • Ciocca M; Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione CNAO , Pavia , Italy.
  • Mairani A; Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione CNAO , Pavia , Italy.
Front Oncol ; 6: 62, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27047796
ABSTRACT
Patient's treatment plan verification covers substantial amount of the quality assurance (QA) resources; this is especially true for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT). The use of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in supporting QA has been widely discussed, and several methods have been proposed. In this paper, we studied an alternative approach from the one being currently applied clinically at Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO). We reanalyzed the previously published data (Molinelli et al. (1)), where 9 patient plans were investigated in which the warning QA threshold of 3% mean dose deviation was crossed. The possibility that these differences between measurement and calculated dose were related to dose modeling (Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) vs. MC), limitations on dose delivery system, or detectors mispositioning was originally explored, but other factors, such as the geometric description of the detectors, were not ruled out. For the purpose of this work, we compared ionization chambers' measurements with different MC simulation results. It was also studied that some physical effects were introduced by this new approach, for example, inter-detector interference and the delta ray thresholds. The simulations accounting for a detailed geometry typically are superior (statistical difference - p-value around 0.01) to most of the MC simulations used at CNAO (only inferior to the shift approach used). No real improvement was observed in reducing the current delta ray threshold used (100 keV), and no significant interference between ion chambers in the phantom were detected (p-value 0.81). In conclusion, it was observed that the detailed geometrical description improves the agreement between measurement and MC calculations in some cases. But in other cases, position uncertainty represents the dominant uncertainty. The inter-chamber disturbance was not detected for the therapeutic protons energies, and the results from the current delta threshold are acceptable for MC simulations in IMPT.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article