Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient education programme on immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis (PEPIMS): a controlled rater-blinded study.
Köpke, S; Kasper, J; Flachenecker, P; Meißner, H; Brandt, A; Hauptmann, B; Bender, G; Backhus, I; Rahn, A C; Pöttgen, J; Vettorazzi, E; Heesen, C.
Afiliação
  • Köpke S; 1 Institute of Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Kasper J; 2 Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Flachenecker P; 3 Neurological Rehabilitation Center Quellenhof, Bad Wildbad, Germany.
  • Meißner H; 3 Neurological Rehabilitation Center Quellenhof, Bad Wildbad, Germany.
  • Brandt A; 4 Department of Neurology, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
  • Hauptmann B; 4 Department of Neurology, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
  • Bender G; 5 Department of Therapeutic Sciences, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Backhus I; 6 RehaCentre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Rahn AC; 7 Unit of Health Sciences and Education, MIN Faculty, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Pöttgen J; 8 Institute of Neuroimmunology & Multiple Sclerosis and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vettorazzi E; 7 Unit of Health Sciences and Education, MIN Faculty, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Heesen C; 8 Institute of Neuroimmunology & Multiple Sclerosis and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(2): 250-261, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072153
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a multi-component evidence-based education programme on disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Controlled trial with two consecutive patient cohorts and a gap of two months between cohorts. SETTING: Three neurological rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Patients with multiple sclerosis within rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Control group (CG) participants were recruited and received standard information. Two months later, intervention group (IG) participants were recruited and received a six-hour nurse-led interactive group education programme consisting of two parts and a comprehensive information brochure. MAIN MEASURES: Primary endpoint was "informed choice", comprising of adequate risk knowledge in combination with congruency between attitude towards immunotherapy and actual immunotherapy uptake. Further outcomes comprised risk knowledge, decision autonomy, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy, and fatigue. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (IG=75, CG=81). The intervention led to significantly more participants with informed choice (IG: 47% vs. CG: 23%, P=0.004). The rate of persons with adequate risk knowledge was significantly higher in the IG two weeks after the intervention (IG: 54% vs. CG: 31%, P=0.007), but not after six months (IG: 48% vs. CG: 31%, P=0.058). No significant differences were shown for positive attitude towards disease modifying therapy (IG: 62% vs. CG: 71%, P=0.29) and for disease modifying therapy status after six months (IG: 61.5% vs CG: 68.6%, P=0.39). Also no differences were found for autonomy preferences and decisional conflict after six months. CONCLUSION: Delivering evidence-based information on multiple sclerosis disease modifying therapies within a rehabilitation setting led to a marked increase of informed choices.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Tomada de Decisões / Imunoterapia / Esclerose Múltipla Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Tomada de Decisões / Imunoterapia / Esclerose Múltipla Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article