Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain.
Sabater, Eliazar; López-Guillermo, Armando; Rueda, Antonio; Salar, Antonio; Oyagüez, Itziar; Collar, Juan Manuel.
Afiliação
  • Sabater E; Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4- letra I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain. esabater@porib.com.
  • López-Guillermo A; Haematology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rueda A; Oncology Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.
  • Salar A; Haematology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Oyagüez I; Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4- letra I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain.
  • Collar JM; Medical Department, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Madrid, Spain.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 14(4): 465-477, 2016 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27090915
BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab-bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab-bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness. RESULTS: Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab-bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab-bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab-bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab-bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations. CONCLUSION: First-line therapy with rituximab-bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Linfoma Folicular / Cloridrato de Bendamustina / Rituximab Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Linfoma Folicular / Cloridrato de Bendamustina / Rituximab Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article