Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alzheimer disease research in the 21st century: past and current failures, new perspectives and funding priorities.
Pistollato, Francesca; Ohayon, Elan L; Lam, Ann; Langley, Gillian R; Novak, Thomas J; Pamies, David; Perry, George; Trushina, Eugenia; Williams, Robin S B; Roher, Alex E; Hartung, Thomas; Harnad, Stevan; Barnard, Neal; Morris, Martha Clare; Lai, Mei-Chun; Merkley, Ryan; Chandrasekera, P Charukeshi.
Afiliação
  • Pistollato F; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Ohayon EL; Green Neuroscience Laboratory, Neurolinx Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Lam A; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Langley GR; Green Neuroscience Laboratory, Neurolinx Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Novak TJ; Research and Toxicology Department, Humane Society International, London, UK.
  • Pamies D; Cellular Dynamics International, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Perry G; CAAT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Trushina E; College of Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Williams RS; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Roher AE; Centre for Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
  • Hartung T; Division of Clinical Education, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.
  • Harnad S; Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Barnard N; CAAT, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Morris MC; Department of Psychology, University of Quebec/Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
  • Lai MC; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Merkley R; Section of Nutrition and Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Chandrasekera PC; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Oncotarget ; 7(26): 38999-39016, 2016 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27229915
ABSTRACT
Much of Alzheimer disease (AD) research has been traditionally based on the use of animals, which have been extensively applied in an effort to both improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and to test novel therapeutic approaches. However, decades of such research have not effectively translated into substantial therapeutic success for human patients. Here we critically discuss these issues in order to determine how existing human-based methods can be applied to study AD pathology and develop novel therapeutics. These methods, which include patient-derived cells, computational analysis and models, together with large-scale epidemiological studies represent novel and exciting tools to enhance and forward AD research. In particular, these methods are helping advance AD research by contributing multifactorial and multidimensional perspectives, especially considering the crucial role played by lifestyle risk factors in the determination of AD risk. In addition to research techniques, we also consider related pitfalls and flaws in the current research funding system. Conversely, we identify encouraging new trends in research and government policy. In light of these new research directions, we provide recommendations regarding prioritization of research funding. The goal of this document is to stimulate scientific and public discussion on the need to explore new avenues in AD research, considering outcome and ethics as core principles to reliably judge traditional research efforts and eventually undertake new research strategies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Biomédica / Doença de Alzheimer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Biomédica / Doença de Alzheimer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article