Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Male and female physical intimate partner violence and socio-economic position: a cross-sectional international multicentre study in Europe.
Costa, D; Hatzidimitriadou, E; Ioannidi-Kapolou, E; Lindert, J; Soares, J J F; Sundin, Ö; Toth, O; Barros, H.
Afiliação
  • Costa D; EPIUnit: Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: dmcosta@med.up.pt.
  • Hatzidimitriadou E; School of Public Health, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Canterbury Christ Church University, United Kingdom.
  • Ioannidi-Kapolou E; Department of Sociology, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
  • Lindert J; University of Applied Sciences Emden, Emden, Germany; WRSC, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Soares JJF; Institution for Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
  • Sundin Ö; Department of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
  • Toth O; Institute of Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Barros H; EPIUnit: Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal.
Public Health ; 139: 44-52, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27262180
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This work explores the association between socio-economic position (SEP) and intimate partner violence (IPV) considering the perspectives of men and women as victims, perpetrators and as both (bidirectional). STUDY

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional international multicentre study.

METHODS:

A sample of 3496 men and women, (aged 18-64 years), randomly selected from the general population of residents from six European cities was assessed Athens; Budapest; London; Östersund; Porto; and Stuttgart. Their education (primary, secondary and university), occupation (upper white collar, lower white collar and blue collar) and unemployment duration (never, ≤12 months and >12 months) were considered as SEP indicators and physical IPV was measured with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales.

RESULTS:

Past year physical IPV was declared by 17.7% of women (3.5% victims, 4.2% perpetrators and 10.0% bidirectional) and 19.8% of men (4.1% victims, 3.8% perpetrators and 11.9% bidirectional). Low educational level (primary vs university) was associated with female victimisation (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 3.2; 1.3-8.0) and with female bidirectional IPV (4.1, 2.4-7.1). Blue collar occupation (vs upper white) was associated with female victimisation (2.1, 1.1-4.0), female perpetration (3.0, 1.3-6.8) and female bidirectional IPV (4.0, 2.3-7.0). Unemployment duration was associated with male perpetration (>12 months of unemployment vs never unemployed 3.8; 1.7-8.7) and with bidirectional IPV in both sex (women 1.8, 1.2-2.7; men 1.7, 1.0-2.8).

CONCLUSIONS:

In these European centres, physical IPV was associated with a disadvantaged SEP. A consistent socio-economic gradient was observed in female bidirectional involvement, but victims or perpetrators-only presented gender specificities according to levels of education, occupation differentiation and unemployment duration potentially useful for designing interventions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Violência por Parceiro Íntimo / Abuso Físico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Violência por Parceiro Íntimo / Abuso Físico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article