Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Melanoma Extirpation with Immediate Reconstruction: The Oncologic Safety and Cost Savings of Single-Stage Treatment.
Karanetz, Irena; Stanley, Sharon; Knobel, Denis; Smith, Benjamin D; Bastidas, Nicholas; Beg, Mansoor; Kasabian, Armen K; Tanna, Neil.
Afiliação
  • Karanetz I; New York, N.Y.
  • Stanley S; From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine.
  • Knobel D; New York, N.Y.
  • Smith BD; From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine.
  • Bastidas N; New York, N.Y.
  • Beg M; From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine.
  • Kasabian AK; New York, N.Y.
  • Tanna N; From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 138(1): 256-261, 2016 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27351470
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The timing of reconstruction following melanoma extirpation remains controversial, with some advocating definitive reconstruction only when the results of permanent pathologic evaluation are available. The authors evaluated oncologic safety and cost benefit of single-stage neoplasm extirpation with immediate reconstruction.

METHODS:

The authors reviewed all patients treated with biopsy-proven melanoma followed by immediate reconstruction during a 3-year period (January of 2011 to December of 2013). Patient demographic data, preoperative biopsies, operative details, and postoperative pathology reports were evaluated. Cost analysis was performed using hospital charges for single-stage surgery versus theoretical two-stage surgery.

RESULTS:

During the study period, 534 consecutive patients were treated with wide excision and immediate reconstruction, including primary closure in 285 patients (55 percent), local tissue rearrangement in 155 patients (30 percent), and skin grafting in 78 patients (15 percent). The mean patient age was 67 years (range, 19 to 98 years), and the median follow-up time was 1.2 years. Shave biopsy was the most common diagnostic modality, resulting in tumor depth underestimation in 30 patients (6.0 percent). Nine patients (2.7 percent) had positive margins on permanent pathologic evaluation. The only variables associated with positive margins were desmoplastic melanoma (p = 0.004) and tumor location on the cheek (p = 0.0001). The mean hospital charge for immediate reconstruction was $22,528 compared with the theoretical mean charge of $35,641 for delayed reconstruction, leading to mean savings of 38.5 percent (SD, 7.9 percent).

CONCLUSION:

This large series demonstrates that immediate reconstruction can be safely performed in melanoma patients with an acceptable rate of residual tumor requiring reoperation and significant health care cost savings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Redução de Custos / Preços Hospitalares / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Melanoma / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Redução de Custos / Preços Hospitalares / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Melanoma / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article