Pathophysiological and diagnostic implications of cardiac biomarkers and antidiuretic hormone release in distinguishing immersion pulmonary edema from decompression sickness.
Medicine (Baltimore)
; 95(26): e4060, 2016 Jun.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-27368044
ABSTRACT
Immersion pulmonary edema (IPE) is a misdiagnosed environmental illness caused by water immersion, cold, and exertion. IPE occurs typically during SCUBA diving, snorkeling, and swimming. IPE is sometimes associated with myocardial injury and/or loss of consciousness in water, which may be fatal. IPE is thought to involve hemodynamic and cardiovascular disturbances, but its pathophysiology remains largely unclear, which makes IPE prevention difficult. This observational study aimed to document IPE pathogenesis and improve diagnostic reliability, including distinguishing in some conditions IPE from decompression sickness (DCS), another diving-related disorder.Thirty-one patients (19 IPE, 12 DCS) treated at the Hyperbaric Medicine Department (Ste-Anne hospital, Toulon, France; July 2013-June 2014) were recruited into the study. Ten healthy divers were recruited as controls. We tested (i) copeptin, a surrogate marker for antidiuretic hormone and a stress marker; (ii) ischemia-modified albumin, an ischemia/hypoxia marker; (iii) brain-natriuretic peptide (BNP), a marker of heart failure, and (iv) ultrasensitive-cardiac troponin-I (cTnI), a marker of myocardial ischemia.We found that copeptin and cardiac biomarkers were higher in IPE versus DCS and controls (i) copeptin 68% of IPE patients had a high level versus 25% of DCS patients (Pâ<â0.05) (meanâ±âstandard-deviation IPE 53â±â61âpmol/L; DCS 15â±â17; controls 6â±â3; IPE versus DCS or controls Pâ<â0.05); (ii) ischemia-modified albumin 68% of IPE patients had a high level versus 16% of DCS patients (Pâ<â0.05) (IPE 123â±â25 arbitrary-units; DCS 84â±â25; controls 94â±â7; IPE versus DCS or controls Pâ<â0.05); (iii) BNP 53% of IPE patients had a high level, DCS patients having normal values (Pâ<â0.05) (IPE 383â±â394âng/L; DCS 37â±â28; controls 19â±â15; IPE versus DCS or controls Pâ<â0.01); (iv) cTnI 63% of IPE patients had a high level, DCS patients having normal values (Pâ<â0.05) (IPE 0.66â±â1.50âµg/L; DCS 0.0061â±â0.0040; controls 0.0090â±â0.01; IPE versus DCS or controls Pâ<â0.01). The combined "BNP-cTnI" levels provided most discrimination all IPE patients, but none of the DCS patients, had elevated levels of either/both of these markers.We propose that antidiuretic hormone acts together with a myocardial ischemic process to promote IPE. Thus, monitoring of antidiuretic hormone and cardiac biomarkers can help to make a quick and reliable diagnosis of IPE.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Edema Pulmonar
/
Vasopressinas
/
Doença da Descompressão
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article