Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke.
Lynch, Elizabeth A; Luker, Julie A; Cadilhac, Dominique A; Fryer, Caroline E; Hillier, Susan L.
Afiliação
  • Lynch EA; 1 International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Luker JA; 1 International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Cadilhac DA; 2 Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
  • Fryer CE; 3 NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery.
  • Hillier SL; 2 Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(7): 966-977, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27421878
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke.

DESIGN:

Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

SETTING:

Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia.

SUBJECTS:

Health professionals working in acute stroke units.

INTERVENTIONS:

Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway.

RESULTS:

Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain 'social and professional role'); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation ('belief about consequences'); the influence of the unit's relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams ('social influences' domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices ('knowledge' domain).

CONCLUSION:

This study has identified that health professionals' perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article