Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis.
Judd, Belinda K; Scanlan, Justin N; Alison, Jennifer A; Waters, Donna; Gordon, Christopher J.
Afiliação
  • Judd BK; Faculty of Health Sciences and Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. belinda.judd@sydney.edu.au.
  • Scanlan JN; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Alison JA; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Waters D; Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Gordon CJ; Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Med Educ ; 16: 196, 2016 Aug 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492325
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the recent widespread adoption of simulation in clinical education in physiotherapy, there is a lack of validated tools for assessment in this setting. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a comprehensive tool used in clinical placement settings in Australia to measure professional competence of physiotherapy students. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of the APP for student assessment in simulation settings.

METHODS:

A total of 1260 APPs were collected, 971 from students in simulation and 289 from students in clinical placements. Rasch analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the APP tool in three different simulation assessment formats longitudinal assessment over 1 week of simulation; longitudinal assessment over 2 weeks; and a short-form (25 min) assessment of a single simulation scenario. Comparison with APPs from 5 week clinical placements in hospital and clinic-based settings were also conducted.

RESULTS:

The APP demonstrated acceptable fit to the expectations of the Rasch model for the 1 and 2 week clinical simulations, exhibiting unidimensional properties that were able to distinguish different levels of student performance. For the short-form simulation, nine of the 20 items recorded greater than 25 % of scores as 'not-assessed' by clinical educators which impacted on the suitability of the APP tool in this simulation format.

CONCLUSION:

The APP was a valid assessment tool when used in longitudinal simulation formats. A revised APP may be required for assessment in short-form simulation scenarios.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Simulação de Paciente / Competência Clínica / Especialidade de Fisioterapia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Simulação de Paciente / Competência Clínica / Especialidade de Fisioterapia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article