Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-Dose PET/CT and Full-Dose Contrast-Enhanced CT at the Initial Staging of Localized Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas.
Sabaté-Llobera, Aida; Cortés-Romera, Montserrat; Mercadal, Santiago; Hernández-Gañán, Javier; Pomares, Helena; González-Barca, Eva; Gámez-Cenzano, Cristina.
Afiliação
  • Sabaté-Llobera A; PET Unit, IDI, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Cortés-Romera M; PET Unit, IDI, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mercadal S; Department of Hematology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hernández-Gañán J; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pomares H; Department of Hematology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • González-Barca E; Department of Hematology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gámez-Cenzano C; PET Unit, IDI, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27559300
ABSTRACT
Computed tomography (CT) has been used as the reference imaging technique for the initial staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma until recent days, when the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging as a hybrid technique has become of routine use. However, the performance of both examinations is still common. The aim of this work was to compare the findings between low-dose 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT and full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) in 28 patients with localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to PET/CT findings, in order to avoid the performance of ceCT. For each technique, a comparison in the number of nodal and extranodal involved regions was performed. PET/CT showed more lesions than ceCT in both nodal (41 vs. 36) and extranodal localizations (16 vs. 15). Disease staging according to both techniques was concordant in 22 patients (79%) and discordant in 6 patients (21%), changing treatment management in 3 patients (11%). PET/CT determined a better staging and therapeutic approach, making the performance of an additional ceCT unnecessary.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article