Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relationship Between Technical Errors and Decision-Making Skills in the Junior Resident.
Nathwani, Jay N; Fiers, Rebekah M; Ray, Rebecca D; Witt, Anna K; Law, Katherine E; DiMarco, ShannonM; Pugh, Carla M.
Afiliação
  • Nathwani JN; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Fiers RM; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Ray RD; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Witt AK; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Law KE; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • DiMarco S; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Pugh CM; Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: pugh@surgery.wisc.edu.
J Surg Educ ; 73(6): e84-e90, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671618
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to coevaluate resident technical errors and decision-making capabilities during placement of a subclavian central venous catheter (CVC). We hypothesize that there would be significant correlations between scenario-based decision-making skills and technical proficiency in central line insertion. We also predict residents would face problems in anticipating common difficulties and generating solutions associated with line placement. DESIGN: Participants were asked to insert a subclavian central line on a simulator. After completion, residents were presented with a real-life patient photograph depicting CVC placement and asked to anticipate difficulties and generate solutions. Error rates were analyzed using chi-square tests and a 5% expected error rate. Correlations were sought by comparing technical errors and scenario-based decision-making skills. SETTING: This study was performed at 7 tertiary care centers. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants (N = 46) largely consisted of first-year research residents who could be followed longitudinally. Second-year research and clinical residents were not excluded. RESULTS: In total, 6 checklist errors were committed more often than anticipated. Residents committed an average of 1.9 errors, significantly more than the 1 error, at most, per person expected (t(44) = 3.82, p < 0.001). The most common error was performance of the procedure steps in the wrong order (28.5%, p < 0.001). Some of the residents (24%) had no errors, 30% committed 1 error, and 46 % committed more than 1 error. The number of technical errors committed negatively correlated with the total number of commonly identified difficulties and generated solutions (r (33) = -0.429, p = 0.021, r (33) = -0.383, p = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the surgical residents committed multiple errors while performing subclavian CVC placement. The correlation between technical errors and decision-making skills suggests a critical need to train residents in both technique and error management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Competência Clínica / Educação Baseada em Competências / Erros Médicos / Treinamento por Simulação / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Venoso Central / Competência Clínica / Educação Baseada em Competências / Erros Médicos / Treinamento por Simulação / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article