Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis.
Pharo, Heidi D; Honne, Hilde; Vedeld, Hege M; Dahl, Christina; Andresen, Kim; Liestøl, Knut; Jeanmougin, Marine; Guldberg, Per; Lind, Guro E.
Afiliação
  • Pharo HD; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Honne H; KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Vedeld HM; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dahl C; Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Andresen K; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Liestøl K; KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Jeanmougin M; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Guldberg P; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lind GE; KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sci Rep ; 6: 33936, 2016 Sep 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671843
ABSTRACT
Diverging methylation frequencies are often reported for the same locus in the same disease, underscoring the need for limiting technical variability in DNA methylation analyses. We have investigated seven likely sources of variability at different steps of bisulfite PCR-based DNA methylation analyses using a fully automated quantitative methylation-specific PCR setup of six gene promoters across 20 colon cancer cell lines. Based on >15,000 individual PCRs, all tested parameters affected the normalized percent of methylated reference (PMR) differences, with a fourfold varying magnitude. Additionally, large variations were observed across the six genes analyzed. The highest variation was seen using single-copy genes as reference for normalization, followed by different amounts of template in the PCR, different amounts of DNA in the bisulfite reaction, and storage of bisulfite converted samples. Finally, when a highly standardized pipeline was repeated, the difference in PMR value for the same assay in the same cell line was on average limited to five (on a 0-100 scale). In conclusion, a standardized pipeline is essential for consistent methylation results, where parameters are kept constant for all samples. Nevertheless, a certain level of variation in methylation values must be expected, underscoring the need for careful interpretation of data.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article