Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cardiac monitoring for detection of atrial fibrillation after TIA: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Korompoki, Eleni; Del Giudice, Angela; Hillmann, Steffi; Malzahn, Uwe; Gladstone, David J; Heuschmann, Peter; Veltkamp, Roland.
Afiliação
  • Korompoki E; 1 Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Stroke Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Del Giudice A; 1 Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Stroke Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Hillmann S; 2 Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Malzahn U; 2 Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Gladstone DJ; 3 Clinical Trial Center, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Heuschmann P; 4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Veltkamp R; 2 Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Int J Stroke ; 12(1): 33-45, 2017 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27681890
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose The detection rate of atrial fibrillation has not been studied specifically in transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients although extrapolation from ischemic stroke may be inadequate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation using different methods of ECG monitoring in TIA. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed following a pre-specified protocol the PRISMA statement. Prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials were considered that included TIA patients who underwent cardiac monitoring for >12 h. Primary outcome was frequency of detection of atrial fibrillation ≥30 s. Analyses of subgroups and of duration and type of monitoring were performed. Results Seventeen studies enrolling 1163 patients were included. The pooled atrial fibrillation detection rate for all methods was 4% (95% CI 2-7%). Yield of monitoring was higher in selected (higher age, more extensive testing for arrhythmias before enrolment, or presumed cardioembolic/cryptogenic cause) than in unselected cohorts (7% vs 3%). Pooled mean atrial fibrillation detection rates rose with duration of monitoring 4% (24 h), 5% (24 h to 7 days) and 6% (>7 days), respectively. Yield of non-invasive was significantly lower than that of invasive monitoring (4% vs. 11%). Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies (I2=60.61%). Conclusion This first meta-analysis of atrial fibrillation detection in TIA patients finds a lower atrial fibrillation detection rate in TIA than reported for IS and TIA cohorts in previous meta-analyses. Prospective studies are needed to determine actual prevalence of atrial fibrillation and optimal diagnostic procedure for atrial fibrillation detection in TIA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Eletrocardiografia / Monitorização Fisiológica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Eletrocardiografia / Monitorização Fisiológica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article