Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.
Fiorentino, Niccolo M; Atkins, Penny R; Kutschke, Michael J; Foreman, K Bo; Anderson, Andrew E.
Afiliação
  • Fiorentino NM; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
  • Atkins PR; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Drive, Room 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
  • Kutschke MJ; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
  • Foreman KB; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Suite 240, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
  • Anderson AE; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Drive, Room 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Suite 240, Salt Lake Cit
Gait Posture ; 50: 246-251, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27693944
ABSTRACT
Hip joint center (HJC) measurement error can adversely affect predictions from biomechanical models. Soft tissue artifact (STA) may exacerbate HJC errors during dynamic motions. We quantified HJC error and the effect of STA in 11 young, asymptomatic adults during six activities. Subjects were imaged simultaneously with reflective skin markers (SM) and dual fluoroscopy (DF), an x-ray based technique with submillimeter accuracy that does not suffer from STA. Five HJCs were defined from locations of SM using three predictive (i.e., based on regression) and two functional methods; these calculations were repeated using the DF solutions. Hip joint center motion was analyzed during six degrees-of-freedom (default) and three degrees-of-freedom hip joint kinematics. The position of the DF-measured femoral head center (FHC), served as the reference to calculate HJC error. The effect of STA was quantified with mean absolute deviation. HJC errors were (mean±SD) 16.6±8.4mm and 11.7±11.0mm using SM and DF solutions, respectively. HJC errors from SM measurements were all significantly different from the FHC in at least one anatomical direction during multiple activities. The mean absolute deviation of SM-based HJCs was 2.8±0.7mm, which was greater than that for the FHC (0.6±0.1mm), suggesting that STA caused approximately 2.2mm of spurious HJC motion. Constraining the hip joint to three degrees-of-freedom led to approximately 3.1mm of spurious HJC motion. Our results indicate that STA-induced motion of the HJC contributes to the overall error, but inaccuracies inherent with predictive and functional methods appear to be a larger source of error.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artefatos / Marcha / Articulação do Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artefatos / Marcha / Articulação do Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article