Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the fugitive emission of CH4 via migration along fault zones - Comparing potential shale gas basins to non-shale basins in the UK.
Boothroyd, I M; Almond, S; Worrall, F; Davies, R J.
Afiliação
  • Boothroyd IM; Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK. Electronic address: i.m.boothroyd@durham.ac.uk.
  • Almond S; School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.
  • Worrall F; Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
  • Davies RJ; School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.
Sci Total Environ ; 580: 412-424, 2017 Feb 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27914640
ABSTRACT
This study considered whether faults bounding hydrocarbon-bearing basins could be conduits for methane release to the atmosphere. Five basin bounding faults in the UK were considered two which bounded potential shale gas basins; two faults that bounded coal basins; and one that bounded a basin with no known hydrocarbon deposits. In each basin, two mobile methane surveys were conducted, one along the surface expression of the basin bounding fault and one along a line of similar length but not intersecting the fault. All survey data was corrected for wind direction, the ambient CH4 concentration and the distance to the possible source. The survey design allowed for Analysis of Variance and this showed that there was a significant difference between the fault and control survey lines though a significant flux from the fault was not found in all basins and there was no apparent link to the presence, or absence, of hydrocarbons. As such, shale basins did not have a significantly different CH4 flux to non-shale hydrocarbon basins and non-hydrocarbon basins. These results could have implications for CH4 emissions from faults both in the UK and globally. Including all the corrected fault data, we estimate faults have an emissions factor of 11.5±6.3tCH4/km/yr, while the most conservative estimate of the flux from faults is 0.7±0.3tCH4/km/yr. The use of isotopes meant that at least one site of thermogenic flux from a fault could be identified. However, the total length of faults that penetrate through-basins and go from the surface to hydrocarbon reservoirs at depth in the UK is not known; as such, the emissions factor could not be multiplied by an activity level to estimate a total UK CH4 flux.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article