Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MEASURING SPORT-SPECIFIC PHYSICAL ABILITIES IN MALE GYMNASTS: THE MEN'S GYMNASTICS FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT TOOL.
Sleeper, Mark D; Kenyon, Lisa K; Elliott, James M; Cheng, M Samuel.
Afiliação
  • Sleeper MD; University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  • Kenyon LK; University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  • Elliott JM; University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  • Cheng MS; University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Int J Sports Phys Ther ; 11(7): 1082-1100, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27999723
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/

BACKGROUND:

Despite the availability of various field-tests for many competitive sports, a reliable and valid test specifically developed for use in men's gymnastics has not yet been developed. The Men's Gymnastics Functional Measurement Tool (MGFMT) was designed to assess sport-specific physical abilities in male competitive gymnasts. The purpose of this study was to develop the MGFMT by establishing a scoring system for individual test items and to initiate the process of establishing test-retest reliability and construct validity.

METHODS:

A total of 83 competitive male gymnasts ages 7-18 underwent testing using the MGFMT. Thirty of these subjects underwent re-testing one week later in order to assess test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed using a simple regression analysis between total MGFMT scores and the gymnasts' USA-Gymnastics competitive level to calculate the coefficient of determination (r2). Test-retest reliability was analyzed using Model 1 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Statistical significance was set at the p<0.05 level.

RESULTS:

The relationship between total MGFMT scores and subjects' current USA-Gymnastics competitive level was found to be good (r2 = 0.63). Reliability testing of the MGFMT composite test score showed excellent test-retest reliability over a one-week period (ICC = 0.97). Test-retest reliability of the individual component tests ranged from good to excellent (ICC = 0.75-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study provide initial support for the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the MGFMT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article