Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science.
Bloss, Cinnamon; Nebeker, Camille; Bietz, Matthew; Bae, Deborah; Bigby, Barbara; Devereaux, Mary; Fowler, James; Waldo, Ann; Weibel, Nadir; Patrick, Kevin; Klemmer, Scott; Melichar, Lori.
Afiliação
  • Bloss C; Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, The Qualcomm Institute, Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Nebeker C; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Bietz M; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Bae D; Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, The Qualcomm Institute, Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Bigby B; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Devereaux M; Department of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Fowler J; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
  • Waldo A; Scripps Human Research Protections Program, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Weibel N; Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Patrick K; Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Klemmer S; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Melichar L; Waldo Law Offices, PLLC, Washington, DC, United States.
J Med Internet Res ; 18(12): e329, 2016 12 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007687
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants.

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system.

METHODS:

A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system.

RESULTS:

Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances.

CONCLUSIONS:

We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Biomédica / Experimentação Humana Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Biomédica / Experimentação Humana Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article