Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study (PrefMab).
Rummel, M; Kim, T M; Aversa, F; Brugger, W; Capochiani, E; Plenteda, C; Re, F; Trask, P; Osborne, S; Smith, R; Grigg, A.
Afiliação
  • Rummel M; Department of Hematology & Oncology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
  • Kim TM; Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Aversa F; University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Brugger W; Schwarzwald-Baar Clinic Villingen-Schwenningen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Capochiani E; Center for Hematology, Livorno, Italy.
  • Plenteda C; University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Re F; University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Trask P; Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
  • Osborne S; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Smith R; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Grigg A; Department of Clinical Haematology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.
Ann Oncol ; 28(4): 836-842, 2017 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28031173
ABSTRACT

Background:

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient preference and satisfaction for the subcutaneous (s.c.) versus intravenous (i.v.) formulation of rituximab given with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients and

methods:

Patients received eight cycles of rituximab according to 2 schedules Arm A received 1 cycle rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) and 3 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg) then 4 cycles rituximab i.v.; Arm B received 4 cycles rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) then 4 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg). Alongside rituximab, both arms received 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP), or bendamustine as per standard local practice). Preference for s.c. or i.v. administration was evaluated using the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) at cycles 6 and 8. Patient satisfaction and convenience were assessed using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) at cycles 4 and 8.

Results:

At the primary data cut-off (19 January 2015), the intent-to-treat population comprised 743 patients. The majority had DLBCL (63%) and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. At cycle 8, 81% of patients completing the PPQ preferred rituximab s.c. Preference was not impacted by treatment sequence or disease type. Patient satisfaction as measured by RASQ was higher for s.c. versus i.v. CTSQ scores were similar between arms. Adverse events were generally balanced between administration routes and no new safety signals were detected.

Conclusion:

Most previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL preferred s.c. to i.v. rituximab administration. Patient satisfaction with rituximab treatment was generally greater with s.c. administration. Registered clinical trial number NCT01724021 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Preferência do Paciente / Rituximab / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Preferência do Paciente / Rituximab / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article