Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Training and Support of General Practitioners in Intensive Treatment of People with Screen-Detected Diabetes Improve Medication, Morbidity and Mortality in People with Clinically-Diagnosed Diabetes? Investigation of a Spill-Over Effect in a Cluster RCT.
Charles, Morten; Skriver, Mette V; Griffin, Simon J; Simmons, Rebecca K; Witte, Daniel R; Dalsgaard, Else-Marie; Lauritzen, Torsten; Sandbæk, Annelli.
Afiliação
  • Charles M; Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark.
  • Skriver MV; Department of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark.
  • Griffin SJ; Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Simmons RK; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Witte DR; Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark.
  • Dalsgaard EM; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Lauritzen T; Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Sandbæk A; Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 6B, Aarhus C, Denmark.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0170697, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28151941
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Very few studies have examined the potential spill-over effect of a trial intervention in general practice. We investigated whether training and support of general practitioners in the intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes improved rates of redeemed medication, morbidity and mortality in people with clinically-diagnosed diabetes.

METHODS:

This is a secondary, post-hoc, register-based analysis linked to a cluster randomised trial. In the ADDITION-Denmark trial, 175 general practices were cluster randomised (i) to routine care, or (ii) to receive training and support in intensive multifactorial treatment of individuals with screen-detected diabetes (2001 to 2009). Using national registers we identified all individuals who were diagnosed with clinically incident diabetes in the same practices over the same time period. (Patients participating in the ADDITION trial were excluded). We compared rates of redeemed medication, a cardiovascular composite endpoint, and all-cause mortality between the routine care and intensive treatment groups.

RESULTS:

In total, 4,107 individuals were diagnosed with clinically incident diabetes in ADDITION-Denmark practices between 2001 and 2009 (2,051 in the routine care group and 2,056 in the intensive treatment group). There were large and significant increases in the proportion of patients redeeming cardio-protective medication in both treatment groups during follow-up. After a median of seven years of follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of a composite cardiovascular endpoint (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.38) or all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.23).

DISCUSSION:

There was no evidence of a spill-over effect from an intervention promoting intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes to those with clinically-diagnosed diabetes. Overall, the proportion of patients redeeming cardio-protective medication during follow-up was similar in both groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00237549.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Achados Incidentais / Diabetes Mellitus / Clínicos Gerais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Achados Incidentais / Diabetes Mellitus / Clínicos Gerais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article