Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Fuller, Brian M; Ferguson, Ian T; Mohr, Nicholas M; Drewry, Anne M; Palmer, Christopher; Wessman, Brian T; Ablordeppey, Enyo; Keeperman, Jacob; Stephens, Robert J; Briscoe, Cristopher C; Kolomiets, Angelina A; Hotchkiss, Richard S; Kollef, Marin H.
Afiliação
  • Fuller BM; 1Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.2School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.3Division of Critical Care, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.4Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of
Crit Care Med ; 45(4): 645-652, 2017 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28157140
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the impact of an emergency department mechanical ventilation protocol on clinical outcomes and adherence to lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN:

Quasi-experimental, before-after trial.

SETTING:

Emergency department and ICUs of an academic center. PATIENTS Mechanically ventilated emergency department patients experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome while in the emergency department or after admission to the ICU.

INTERVENTIONS:

An emergency department ventilator protocol which targeted variables in need of quality improvement, as identified by prior work 1) lung-protective tidal volume, 2) appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure, 3) oxygen weaning, and 4) head-of-bed elevation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

A total of 229 patients (186 preintervention group, 43 intervention group) were studied. In the emergency department, the intervention was associated with significant changes (p < 0.01 for all) in tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen administration, and head-of-bed elevation. There was a reduction in emergency department tidal volume from 8.1 mL/kg predicted body weight (7.0-9.1) to 6.4 mL/kg predicted body weight (6.1-6.7) and an increase in lung-protective ventilation from 11.1% to 61.5%, p value of less than 0.01. The intervention was associated with a reduction in mortality from 54.8% to 39.5% (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.83; p = 0.02) and a 3.9 day increase in ventilator-free days, p value equals to 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS:

This before-after study of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrates that implementing a mechanical ventilator protocol in the emergency department is feasible and associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Respiração com Pressão Positiva / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Respiração com Pressão Positiva / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article