Impact of an intrahospital mobile thrombolysis team on 3-month clinical outcomes in patients benefiting from intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The benefits of thrombolysis in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (IS) are highly time-dependent. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical benefit, after 3 months, of an intrahospital mobile thrombolysis team (MTT) for thrombolysis in IS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 95 consecutive patients treated with IV tPA for acute IS at the neurology department of Rouen University Hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2015 were retrospectively identified. Patients who had benefited from mechanical thrombectomy or hemicraniectomy were excluded. The study compared 33 patients who had benefited from our MTT (thrombolysis whatever the location and as soon as possible by a specific nurse) with 62 patients treated in the usual way (thrombolysis only at the stroke unit). Management timescales, inhospital and 3-month clinical outcomes, and imaging data were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Demographic data and factors known to influence the clinical course after thrombolysis were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). However, use of the MTT allowed significant decreases in the median onset-to-treatment (OTT) time of 26min and median door-to-needle (DTN) time of 27min (P<0.001). The proportion of patients with a DTN time<60min was higher in the MTT group than in the usual care (UC) group 64% vs. 14%, respectively (P<0.001), according to American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Although there was a smaller proportion of negative 3-month outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 6; 6% vs. 16%) and a larger proportion of highly favorable 3-month outcomes (mRS score 0-1; 79% vs. 64%) in the MTT vs. UC groups, respectively, these differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Use of an MTT is a simple way to reduce thrombolysis delays, and the present results encourage us to improve the system to make it even more effective and available for all patients.