Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the SenseWear Armband accurate enough to quantify and estimate energy expenditure in healthy adults?
Santos-Lozano, Alejandro; Hernández-Vicente, Adrián; Pérez-Isaac, Raúl; Santín-Medeiros, Fernanda; Cristi-Montero, Carlos; Casajús, Jose Antonio; Garatachea, Nuria.
Afiliação
  • Santos-Lozano A; Department of Health Sciences, GIDFYS, European University Miguel de Cervantes, Valladolid, Spain;; Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre ("i+12"), Madrid, Spain.
  • Hernández-Vicente A; Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Pérez-Isaac R; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of León, León, Spain.
  • Santín-Medeiros F; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of León, León, Spain.
  • Cristi-Montero C; IRyS Group, Physical Education School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
  • Casajús JA; Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; GENUD research group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Spain;; Institu
  • Garatachea N; Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre ("i+12"), Madrid, Spain;; Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; GENUD research group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red d
Ann Transl Med ; 5(5): 97, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28361062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The SenseWear Armband (SWA) is a monitor that can be used to estimate energy expenditure (EE); however, it has not been validated in healthy adults. The objective of this paper was to study the validity of the SWA for quantifying EE levels.

METHODS:

Twenty-three healthy adults (age 40-55 years, mean 48±3.42 years) performed different types of standardized physical activity (PA) for 10 minutes (rest, walking at 3 and 5 km·h-1, running at 7 and 9 km·h-1, and sitting/standing at a rate of 30 cycle·min-1). Participants wore the SWA on their right arm, and their EE was measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) the gold standard.

RESULTS:

There were significant differences between the SWA and IC, except in the group that ran at 9 km·h-1 (>9 METs). Bland-Altman analysis showed a BIAS of 1.56 METs (±1.83 METs) and limits of agreement (LOA) at 95% of -2.03 to 5.16 METs. There were indications of heteroscedasticity (R2 =0.03; P<0.05). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the SWA seems to be not sensitive enough to estimate the level of EE at highest intensities.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SWA is not as precise in estimating EE as IC, but it could be a useful tool to determine levels of EE at low intensities.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article