Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The PLATINO study: description of the distribution, stability, and mortality according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification from 2007 to 2017.
Menezes, Ana M; Wehrmeister, Fernando C; Perez-Padilla, Rogelio; Viana, Karynna P; Soares, Claudia; Müllerova, Hana; Valdivia, Gonzalo; Jardim, José R; Montes de Oca, Maria.
Afiliação
  • Menezes AM; Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Wehrmeister FC; Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Perez-Padilla R; National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Viana KP; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Soares C; GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Müllerova H; GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stockley Park, UK.
  • Valdivia G; Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Republic of Chile.
  • Jardim JR; Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Montes de Oca M; Pulmonary Division, Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 12: 1491-1501, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553101
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report provides a framework for classifying COPD reflecting the impacts of disease on patients and for targeting treatment recommendations. The GOLD 2017 introduced a new classification with 16 subgroups based on a composite of spirometry and symptoms/exacerbations.

METHODS:

Data from the population-based PLATINO study, collected at baseline and at follow-up, in three sites in Latin America were analyzed to compare the following 1) the distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2007, 2013, and 2017; 2) the stability of the 2007 and 2013 classifications; and 3) the mortality rate over time stratified by GOLD 2007, 2013, and 2017.

RESULTS:

Of the 524 COPD patients evaluated, most of them were classified as Grade I or II (GOLD 2007) and Group A or B (GOLD 2013), with ≈70% of those classified as Group A in GOLD 2013 also classified as Grade I in GOLD 2007 and the highest percentage (41%) in Group D (2013) classified as Grade III (2007). According to GOLD 2017, among patients with Grade I airflow limitation, 69% of them were categorized into Group A, whereas Grade IV patients were more evenly distributed among Groups A-D. Most of the patients classified by GOLD 2007 remained in the same airflow limitation group at the follow-up; a greater temporal variability was observed with GOLD 2013 classification. Incidence-mortality rate in patients classified by GOLD 2007 was positively associated with increasing severity of airflow obstruction; for GOLD 2013 and GOLD 2017 (Groups A-D), highest mortality rates were observed in Groups C and D. No clear pattern was observed for mortality across the GOLD 2017 subgroups.

CONCLUSION:

The PLATINO study data suggest that GOLD 2007 classification shows more stability over time compared with GOLD 2013. No clear patterns with respect to the distribution of patients or incidence-mortality rates were observed according to GOLD 2013/2017 classification.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Pulmão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Pulmão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article