Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI.
Diederichs, G; Hoppe, P; Collettini, F; Wassilew, G; Hamm, B; Brenner, W; Makowski, M R.
Afiliação
  • Diederichs G; Department of Radiology, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hoppe P; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
  • Collettini F; Department of Radiology, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wassilew G; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hamm B; Department of Radiology, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Brenner W; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
  • Makowski MR; Department of Radiology, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. marcus.makowski@charite.de.
Skeletal Radiol ; 46(9): 1249-1258, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28623409
PURPOSE: To test the diagnostic performance of bone SPECT/CT and MRI for the evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone-arthroplasty with histopathology used as gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients after girdlestone-arthroplasty were imaged with single-photon-emission-computed-tomography/computed-tomography (SPECT/CT) bone-scans using 99mTc-DPD. Additionally, 1.5 T MRI was performed with turbo-inversion-recovery-magnitude (TIRM), contrast-enhanced T1-fat sat (FS) and T1-mapping. All imaging was performed within 24 h prior to revision total-hip-arthroplasty in patients with a girdlestone-arthroplasty. In each patient, four standardized bone-tissue-biopsies (14 patients) were taken intraoperatively at the remaining acetabulum superior/inferior and trochanter major/minor. Histopathological evaluation of bone samples regarding bone viability was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 56 bone-segments were analysed and classified as vital (n = 39) or nonvital (n = 17) by histopathology. Mineral/late-phase SPECT/CT showed a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%) to distinguish viable and nonviable bone tissue. TIRM (sensitivity 87%, specificity 88%) and contrast-enhanced T1-FS (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%) also achieved a high sensitivity and specificity. T1-mapping achieved the lowest values (sensitivity 82%, specificity 82%). False positive results in SPECT/CT and MRI resulted from small bone fragments close to metal artefacts. CONCLUSIONS: Both bone SPECT/CT and MRI allow a reliable differentiation between viable and nonviable bone tissue in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty. The findings of this study could also be relevant for the evaluation of bone viability in the context of avascular bone necrosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Imagem Multimodal / Articulação do Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Imagem Multimodal / Articulação do Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article