Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential of RASSF1A promoter methylation as biomarker for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pabalan, Noel; Kunjantarachot, Anthicha; Ruangpratheep, Chetana; Jarjanazi, Hamdi; Christofolini, Denise Maria; Barbosa, Caio Parente; Bianco, Bianca.
Afiliação
  • Pabalan N; Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand. Electronic address: npabalan@alumni.yorku.ca.
  • Kunjantarachot A; Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
  • Ruangpratheep C; Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Jarjanazi H; Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, 125 Resources Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Christofolini DM; Human Reproduction and Genetics Center, Department of Collective Health, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André/SP, Brazil.
  • Barbosa CP; Human Reproduction and Genetics Center, Department of Collective Health, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André/SP, Brazil.
  • Bianco B; Human Reproduction and Genetics Center, Department of Collective Health, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André/SP, Brazil.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 603-608, 2017 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28669560
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An epigenetic approach to explaining endometrial carcinogenesis necessitates good understanding of Ras association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) promoter methylation data from primary studies.

AIMS:

Differential magnitude of reported associations between RASSF1A promoter methylation and endometrial cancer (EC) prompted a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates.

METHODS:

Literature search yielded eight included articles. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals and subgrouped the data by race. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated with outlier analysis.

RESULTS:

The pooled ORs indicated increased risk, mostly significant. The overall effect (OR 11.46) was reflected in the European outcome (OR 15.07). However, both findings were heterogeneous (I2=57-70%) which when subjected to outlier treatment, erased heterogeneity (I2=0%) and retained significance (OR 9.85-12.66). Significance of these pre- and post-outlier outcomes were pegged at P≤0.0001. Only the Asian pre-outlier (OR 6.85) and heterogeneous (I2=82%) outcome was not significant (P=0.12) but when subjected to outlier treatment, erased heterogeneity (I2=0%) and generated significance (OR 23.74, P≤0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Consistent increased risk associations underpinned by significance and robustness render RASSF1A with good biomarker potential for EC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Metilação de DNA / Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Metilação de DNA / Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article