Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early 68GA-PSMA PET/MRI acquisition: assessment of lesion detectability and PET metrics in patients with prostate cancer undergoing same-day late PET/CT.
Domachevsky, L; Bernstine, H; Goldberg, N; Nidam, M; Stern, D; Sosna, J; Groshar, D.
Afiliação
  • Domachevsky L; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Bernstine H; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Goldberg N; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Nidam M; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Stern D; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Sosna J; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Groshar D; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: davidg@assuta.co.il.
Clin Radiol ; 72(11): 944-950, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28716214
AIM: To compare lesion detectability and positron-emission tomography (PET) metric measurements between early-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and same-day PET/computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-one patients underwent non-time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI immediately following 68GA-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer injection in two steps: firstly, early prostate PET/MRI (pPET/MRI) and early whole-body (WB) PET/MRI (wbPET/MR) followed by WB TOF PET/CT (wbPET/CT). Lesion detectability was compared between wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT while PET metric measurements were compared between pPET/MR, wbPET/MRI, and wbPET/CT. RESULTS: Sixty-one and 63 lesions were found on wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT, respectively (K=0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.89-1.0) with very good correlation between PET metric measurements (r=0.91; p=0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a mean percentage difference between wbPET/CT with wbPET/MRI of 34.4% with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between -39% to 107.9% for metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and a mean difference of 30% with LOA between -13.4% to 73.4% for peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak). CONCLUSION: Early PET/MRI demonstrates very good lesion detectability agreement and correlation with PET metrics compared to same-day PET/CT. Nevertheless, LOA are far beyond the clinically acceptable range, and therefore, PET/CT and early PET/MRI metrics cannot be used interchangeably.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos / Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Antígenos de Superfície Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos / Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Antígenos de Superfície Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article