Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacologic Considerations in the Management of Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Allender, J Erin; Reed, Brent N; Foster, Jenna L; Moretz, Jeremy D; Oliphant, Carrie S; Jennings, Douglas L; DiDomenico, Robert J; Coons, James C.
Afiliação
  • Allender JE; Department of Pharmacy, WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Reed BN; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Foster JL; Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Palmetto Health Richland, Columbia, South Carolina.
  • Moretz JD; Department of Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Oliphant CS; Department of Pharmacy, Methodist Healthcare-University Hospital and University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Jennings DL; Department of Pharmacy, New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • DiDomenico RJ; Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Coons JC; Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy and UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pharmacotherapy ; 37(10): 1272-1283, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28741848
Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, including the intraaortic balloon pump, Impella, and TandemHeart, are often used for hemodynamic support in the setting of refractory cardiogenic shock. The thrombotic and bleeding complications associated with these devices is well recognized, and the Impella and TandemHeart devices have unique anticoagulation considerations that may influence patient outcomes. Both devices typically require use of a heparinized purge solution in combination with intravenous unfractionated heparin, thereby providing multiple sources of heparin exposure. Each device also has specific monitoring requirements and goal ranges. This review provides an overview of percutaneous MCS devices commonly used in the acute management of left ventricular failure, with an emphasis on pharmacologic considerations. We review recent evidence and guidelines and provide recommendations for appropriate use of anticoagulation during device support. Approaches to managing heparinized purge solutions, monitoring, and the utility of nonheparin anticoagulants are also provided because high-quality evidence in the literature is limited.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Cardiogênico / Heparina / Coração Auxiliar / Ventrículos do Coração / Balão Intra-Aórtico / Anticoagulantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Cardiogênico / Heparina / Coração Auxiliar / Ventrículos do Coração / Balão Intra-Aórtico / Anticoagulantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article