Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints.
Schüler, Svenja; Kieser, Meinhard; Rauch, Geraldine.
Afiliação
  • Schüler S; Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. schueler@imbi.uni-heidelberg.de.
  • Kieser M; Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
  • Rauch G; Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 17(1): 119, 2017 Aug 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28789615
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In clinical trials, the opportunity for an early stop during an interim analysis (either for efficacy or for futility) may relevantly save time and financial resources. This is especially important, if the planning assumptions required for power calculation are based on a low level of evidence. For example, when including two primary endpoints in the confirmatory analysis, the power of the trial depends on the effects of both endpoints and on their correlation. Assessing the feasibility of such a trial is therefore difficult, as the number of parameter assumptions to be correctly specified is large. For this reason, so-called 'group sequential designs' are of particular importance in this setting. Whereas the choice of adequate boundaries to stop a trial early for efficacy has been broadly discussed in the literature, the choice of optimal futility boundaries has not been investigated so far, although this may have serious consequences with respect to performance characteristics.

METHODS:

In this work, we propose a general method to construct 'optimal' futility boundaries according to predefined criteria. Further, we present three different group sequential designs for two endpoints applying these futility boundaries. Our methods are illustrated by a real clinical trial example and by Monte-Carlo simulations.

RESULTS:

By construction, the provided method of choosing futility boundaries maximizes the probability to correctly stop in case of small or opposite effects while limiting the power loss and the probability of stopping the study 'wrongly'. Our results clearly demonstrate the benefit of using such 'optimal' futility boundaries, especially compared to futility boundaries commonly applied in practice.

CONCLUSIONS:

As the properties of futility boundaries are often not considered in practice and unfavorably chosen futility boundaries may imply bad properties of the study design, we recommend assessing the performance of these boundaries according to the criteria proposed in here.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Comportamento de Escolha / Futilidade Médica / Determinação de Ponto Final Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Comportamento de Escolha / Futilidade Médica / Determinação de Ponto Final Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article