Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of the low-frequency/high-frequency ratio of heart rate variability to predict short-term deterioration in emergency department patients with sepsis.
Barnaby, Douglas P; Fernando, Shannon M; Ferrick, Kevin J; Herry, Christophe L; Seely, Andrew J E; Bijur, Polly E; Gallagher, E John.
Afiliação
  • Barnaby DP; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
  • Fernando SM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ferrick KJ; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
  • Herry CL; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Seely AJE; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bijur PE; Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gallagher EJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Emerg Med J ; 35(2): 96-102, 2018 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28821492
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the ability of the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis to identify patients with sepsis at risk of early deterioration.

METHODS:

This is a prospective observational cohort study of patients with sepsis presenting to the Montefiore Medical Center ED from December 2014 through September 2015. On presentation, a single ECG Holter recording was obtained and analysed to obtain the LF/HF ratio of HRV. Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were computed. Patients were followed for 72 hours to identify those with early deterioration.

RESULTS:

466 patients presenting to the ED with sepsis were analysed. Thirty-two (7%) reached at least one endpoint within 72 hours. An LF/HF ratio <1 had a sensitivity and specificity of 34% (95% CI (19% to 53%)) and 82% (95% CI (78% to 85%)), respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 1.9 (95% CI (1.1 to 3.2)) and 0.8 (95% CI (0.6 to 1.0)). An initial SOFA score ≥3 had a sensitivity and specificity of 38% (95% CI (22% to 56%)) and 92% (95% CI (89% to 95%)), with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 4.9 (95% CI (2.8 to 8.6)) and 0.7 (95% CI (0.5 to 0.9)). The composite measure of HRV+SOFA had improved sensitivity (56%, 95% CI (38% to 73%)) but at the expense of specificity (77%, 95% CI (72% to 80%)), with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2.4 (95% CI (1.7 to 3.4)) and 0.6 (95% CI (0.4 to 0.9)). Receiver operating characteristic analysis did not identify a superior alternate threshold for the LF/HF ratio. Kaplan-Meier survival functions differed significantly (p=0.02) between low (<1) and high (≥1) LF/HF groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

While we found a statistically significant relationship between HRV, SOFA and HRV+SOFA, and early deterioration, none reliably functioned as a clinical predictive tool. More complex multivariable models will likely be required to construct models with clinical utility.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ondas de Rádio / Sepse / Determinação da Frequência Cardíaca / Deterioração Clínica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ondas de Rádio / Sepse / Determinação da Frequência Cardíaca / Deterioração Clínica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article