Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Greater hypertrophy can be achieved with associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy compared to conventional staged hepatectomy, but with a higher price to pay?
Chia, Daryl K A; Yeo, Zachery; Loh, Stanley E K; Iyer, Shridhar Ganpathi; Bonney, Glenn Kunnath; Madhavan, Krishnakumar; Kow, Alfred W C.
Afiliação
  • Chia DKA; Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Yeo Z; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Loh SEK; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Iyer SG; Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Bonney GK; Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Madhavan K; Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Kow AWC; Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore. Electronic address: alfred_kow@nuhs.edu.sg.
Am J Surg ; 215(1): 131-137, 2018 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and conventional staged hepatectomy (CSH) are options for patients with unresectable liver tumors due to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR).

METHODS:

A retrospective comparison of clinical data, liver volumetry and surgical outcomes between 10 ALPPS and 29 CSH patients was performed.

RESULTS:

Patient demographics and disease characteristics were similar between both groups. ALPPS induced superior FLR growth (ALPPS vs. CSH, 48.1% (IQR 39.4-96.9%) vs. 11.8% (IQR 4.3-41.9%), p = 0.013). However, post-operative day 5 international normalized ratio (INR) (ALPPS vs. CSH, 1.6 (IQR 1.5-1.8) vs. 1.4 (IQR 1.3-1.6), p = 0.015) and rate of post-hepatectomy liver failure (ALPPS vs. CSH, 25 vs. 0%, p = 0.032) was higher in the ALPPS group. 90-day mortality (ALPPS vs. CSH, 12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.320) was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

ALPPS was superior in inducing FLR growth but associated with increased post-hepatectomy liver failure compared to CSH.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Regeneração Hepática Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Hepatectomia / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Regeneração Hepática Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article